Original transcript

  We'll see if this works.
  I don't know what to say about this.
  The subject is that I'm testing rubber ducky yet again with some different prompts for style to match more of my voice, if that's possible.
  I want to tell it to not be so cheesy.
  It's kind of repeating some fraye.

Prompt text to Claude

  "Can you write a developer personal log entry blog post from this transcript? I would like this to be re-written as a blog post in a casual, pleasant and intelligent style. Be as detailed and lengthy as possible. Add additional specifics where possible. Be kind, patient, informative, guiding, with a sense of humor. Our intention here is to share in a way that is not overly excited, but encouraging for others to try things. Try to vary your style throughout the post. Try not to sound like you are trying to sell something. Pontificate more, but not so cheesy. Try to use more of my phrasing from the transcript, if possible. In fact, be as verbatim as is logically possible."

const msg = await anthropic.messages.create({
  model: "claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
  max_tokens: 1000,
  temperature: 0,
  system: transcript,
  messages: [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": [
        {
          "type": "text",
          "text": "Can you write a developer personal log entry blog post from this transcript? I would like this to be re-written as a blog post in a casual, pleasant and intelligent style. Be as detailed and lengthy as possible. Add additional specifics where possible. Be kind, patient, informative, guiding, with a sense of humor. Our intention here is to share in a way that is not overly excited, but encouraging for others to try things. Try to vary your style throughout the post. Try not to sound like you are trying to sell something. Pontificate more, but not so cheesy. Try to use more of my phrasing from the transcript, if possible. In fact, be as verbatim as is logically possible."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
})

Results

* Developer's Log: Experimenting with AI Writing Assistants

  Hey there, fellow code wranglers and curious minds! Today, I'm diving back into the world of AI writing assistants, specifically giving Rubber Ducky another whirl. You know how it goes - always tinkering, always testing.
  So, here's the deal: I've been playing around with different prompts, trying to coax the AI into matching my voice more closely. It's an interesting challenge, to say the least. I mean, how do you teach a machine to sound like... well, you? One thing I've noticed is that these AI assistants can sometimes come across a bit... how shall I put it? Cheesy. Yeah, that's the word. It's like they're trying to sell you something, even when that's not the intention at all. So, I've been experimenting with ways to tone that down a notch.
  I've also observed that they tend to fall into patterns, repeating certain phrases or structures. It's almost like they get stuck in a loop, you know? So, I'm working on prompts that encourage more variety in the output.
  Now, I don't want to sound like I'm complaining. These tools are pretty impressive when you think about it. But like any tool, it's all about learning how to use them effectively. It's a process, and that's what makes it interesting.
  One approach I'm trying is to be more specific in my prompts. Instead of just saying "write in my voice," I'm trying to break down what that actually means. What makes my writing style unique? How can I communicate that to an AI?
  It's also about finding that sweet spot between guidance and freedom. You want to give the AI enough direction to stay on track, but not so much that you're essentially writing the whole thing yourself. It's a delicate balance, and I'm still figuring it out.
  Throughout this process, I've been reminded of the importance of patience. These things take time to get right. It's not going to be perfect on the first try, or even the tenth. But each attempt teaches you something new.
  I'm also trying to keep a sense of humor about the whole thing. Some of the outputs can be pretty amusing, especially when the AI misinterprets something. It's a good reminder that while these tools are powerful, they're not infallible.
  One thing I'm particularly interested in is how to get the AI to pontificate more without sounding, well, pontifical. It's a fine line between sharing knowledge and sounding like you're lecturing. I'm still working on cracking that code.
  Another challenge is maintaining a consistent tone throughout a piece. The AI seems to do well with short bursts, but sustaining a particular style over a longer post can be tricky. It's something I'm keeping an eye on as I continue to experiment.
  At the end of the day, this is all about exploration and learning. I'm not trying to replace my own writing, but rather to find ways to enhance and streamline my process. It's about working smarter, not harder, you know?
  So, if you're thinking about dipping your toes into the world of AI writing assistants, I'd say go for it. Be prepared for some trial and error, and don't expect perfection right off the bat. But who knows? You might just discover a new tool that changes the way you work.
  As for me, I'll keep tinkering away, seeing what I can coax out of these fascinating tools. Who knows what I'll discover next? Stay tuned, and happy coding!

Developer’s Log: Experimenting with AI Writing Assistants

Hey there, fellow code wranglers and curious minds! Today, I’m diving back into the world of AI writing assistants, specifically giving Rubber Ducky another whirl. You know how it goes - always tinkering, always testing.

So, here’s the deal: I’ve been playing around with different prompts, trying to coax the AI into matching my voice more closely. It’s an interesting challenge, to say the least. I mean, how do you teach a machine to sound like… well, you? One thing I’ve noticed is that these AI assistants can sometimes come across a bit… how shall I put it? Cheesy. Yeah, that’s the word. It’s like they’re trying to sell you something, even when that’s not the intention at all. So, I’ve been experimenting with ways to tone that down a notch.

I’ve also observed that they tend to fall into patterns, repeating certain phrases or structures. It’s almost like they get stuck in a loop, you know? So, I’m working on prompts that encourage more variety in the output. Now, I don’t want to sound like I’m complaining. These tools are pretty impressive when you think about it. But like any tool, it’s all about learning how to use them effectively. It’s a process, and that’s what makes it interesting.

One approach I’m trying is to be more specific in my prompts. Instead of just saying “write in my voice,” I’m trying to break down what that actually means. What makes my writing style unique? How can I communicate that to an AI? It’s also about finding that sweet spot between guidance and freedom. You want to give the AI enough direction to stay on track, but not so much that you’re essentially writing the whole thing yourself. It’s a delicate balance, and I’m still figuring it out.

Throughout this process, I’ve been reminded of the importance of patience. These things take time to get right. It’s not going to be perfect on the first try, or even the tenth. But each attempt teaches you something new. I’m also trying to keep a sense of humor about the whole thing. Some of the outputs can be pretty amusing, especially when the AI misinterprets something. It’s a good reminder that while these tools are powerful, they’re not infallible.

One thing I’m particularly interested in is how to get the AI to pontificate more without sounding, well, pontifical. It’s a fine line between sharing knowledge and sounding like you’re lecturing. I’m still working on cracking that code. Another challenge is maintaining a consistent tone throughout a piece. The AI seems to do well with short bursts, but sustaining a particular style over a longer post can be tricky. It’s something I’m keeping an eye on as I continue to experiment.

At the end of the day, this is all about exploration and learning. I’m not trying to replace my own writing, but rather to find ways to enhance and streamline my process. It’s about working smarter, not harder, you know?

So, if you’re thinking about dipping your toes into the world of AI writing assistants, I’d say go for it. Be prepared for some trial and error, and don’t expect perfection right off the bat. But who knows? You might just discover a new tool that changes the way you work. As for me, I’ll keep tinkering away, seeing what I can coax out of these fascinating tools. Who knows what I’ll discover next? Stay tuned, and happy coding!